Tags: Aerospace, Association, eBusiness, International Business, Marketing, Social Media, Twitter
add a comment
Last week in Barcelona marked the annual general assembly of the European Region Airlines Association (ERA). This group represents the interests of intra-European aviation in Europe. ERA’s membership is composed of 51 airlines (mostly low-fare and/or regional), 21 airports, 10 manufacturers and 116 suppliers. Although this event is always well attended, this industry in particular is strapped for time and resources, leaving many to watch the proceeding from afar. In this post, I analyze how the event was covered online.
THE ORGANIZER @ERAAorg
The organizers did a good job setting up an informative and dedicated section of their website before the event as well as promoting the hashtag “#ERA14” well ahead of time. [See what happens to conference organizers that don't do that]. As a result, the online chatter was good with 171 users mentioning the event in their posts, reaching an audience of just under 750,000 users.
The organizers posted 49 updates on twitter throughout the event both aimed at attendees as well as the broader audience watching from home. It is for them that I wish ERA had posted daily summaries as promised (only day 1 was posted), perhaps even in video. But news was also delivered by specialty publication Low-fare and Regional Airlines (@news_LARA) and its team attending the event. It was disappointing that FlightGlobal did not report on the event at all.
Although the association counts 51 airlines in its membership NONE of them reported anything online. They were called out explicitly in some tweets (for example for winning awards) but did not seem to be listening. Even the airports in the association did better than the airlines (especially Shannon Airport after winning Airport Achievement award). So I guess that the airlines are limiting their Twitter and other online interactions for customer service.
But my question is: if there is so much benefit and requirement to interact online with customers, how could there be apparently no benefit in interacting with suppliers and manufacturers? I am not suggesting mixing the two conversations (B2C for passengers and B2B with suppliers), but it is strange to see this dichotomy between the two sides of the house at most airlines.
Out of the 29 exhibitors at the event, two-thrid have Twitter accounts. But for strange reasons only 4 of them decided to use it for ERA14. @ATRaircraft and @PWcanada where the most active, as you can see from their influence in the topic cloud above. Pratt & Whitney also cleverly used the occasion to promote the 30th anniversary of the PW100 engine series. @Bombardier_aero and @SuperJetIntl (Sukoi) also jumped into the conversation but there was no sign of Embrear or Saab. It is sad to see that other exhibitors that usually do a good job at covering other events online, did not bother to participate, especially when their competitors are there!
What did you think of the online coverage at the show? What was missing? What would you like to see in the future? Feel free to leave a comment below and start the conversation.
AND NOW A WORD FROM A RANDOM SPONSOR
Commercial Helicopter industry under served online? Not exactly says Vertical magazine! September 24, 2014Posted by ludozone in Aerospace, eBusiness Applications/Services, FaceBook, International Business Development, Internet Marketing, Social Media, Twitter.
Tags: Aerospace, BizAv, eBusiness, FaceBook, Helicopter, International Business, Publishing, Social Media, Twitter, Website
1 comment so far
In my recent post “Civilian Helicopters: the most under served AeroSpace sector for online news and information?”, I suggested that more should be done online for this important portion of the industry. My post sollicited an immediate reaction from leading commercial helicopters magazine Vertical, pointing out that I had not considered FaceBook in my analysis.
I usually do not think of FaceBook when I write about online B2B in the AeroSpace industry because of my strongly held motto: “Personal FaceBook and Professional LinkedIn”. However, based on the suggestion from Vertical, I added the number of page “likes” for the organizations I reviewed in my commercial helicopter online coverage statistics. The results were impressive! The top 5 Facebook pages were:
The Civil Helicopter industry on FaceBook
Over 146 thousand fans on FaceBook? I had to find out more from Vertical magazine. Elan Head, their award-winning Special Projects Editor and an accomplished helicopter pilot and instructor, agreed to an in-depth interview. It turns out she has put a lot of thoughts in the use of the internet in the commercial helicopter industry, especially when it comes to safety.
Elan started by explaining that “Our weekly total reach on Facebook is typically around 300,000 to 400,000, although it has been as high as 2.3 million. Our weekly engagement is typically around 10 percent of our total reach. Our target audience is the helicopter operators, i.e. the people that buy, fly and maintain helicopters. We are proud that a full half of the fans are are in the 18-34 age group with another 21 percent in the 35-44 age group. 76% are from outside the USA.” These are impressive numbers and they reveal an entire group of people not necessarily engaged in B2B sites, traditional industry media, or Twitter. But perhaps they are just a bunch of Helicopter Geeks (#HeloGeeks), fascinated by beautiful photographs of helicopters? “We find that all our Facebook fans have a great passion for helicopters but also have a tremendous amount of insight and comments”, responded Elan, “It is not rare for us to derive great story ideas for the magazine from discussions that initiated on FaceBook. We also know they are industry professionals, because one of our most popular article online is a 5,000-word story on attitude indicators, reflecting our audience’s passion and personal investment in the business.”
Discussing this audience on FaceBook, we came to the conclusion that they prefer this medium because they can engage in the conversation as an individual rather than a representative of their business. This is perhaps a symptom of the continued disengagement between management and the people on the front lines when it comes to business and particularly safety. The discussion at a B2B level is quite different that the “in the tranches” remarks found in FaceBook comments. There is really no online forum where real industry issues can be discussed away from the eyes of the general public but without the distortions of corporate “policies”.
Elan said that Vertical’s social media presence has, in fact, evolved pretty naturally from their traditional identity as a print magazine: “By targeting operators, Vertical Magazine has always been close to the front lines of the helicopter industry, which are populated by people who are incredibly passionate about all things helicopter. I think that’s the passion you see reflected in our Facebook page, which has become a place for people to share photos and videos of their helicopter operations from around the world. Facebook is not a medium for sharing hourly news updates, but when we do share significant stories, they tend to generate a lot of shares and lively conversation. Our migration to Twitter has followed the migration of helicopter operators and their employees to that platform — which has certainly happened, but I do think it has lagged behind the fixed-wing world. The general online conservatism of the helicopter industry may have something to do with the fact that a lot of people in it do spend six or eight months of the year in the bush… if you get antsy without being able to check your phone every five minutes, you’re not going to do very well in a remote fire or mining camp.”
The role of traditional magazine in the online landscape
Vertical’s online presence evolved from a magazine focused on in-depth articles and gorgeous pictures, printed on glossy paper 6 times a year. They are trying to tackle the challenge of maintaining credibility not only with the industry’s C-level executives, but also with the helicopter pilot and field mechanics who spend eight months out of the year in the bush. But with a new generation of professionals and a greater portion of the industry connected online, breaking news is certainly becoming more important. This has been demonstrated by the arrival of new “hot-news-only” players like HeliHub.com that have found a niche in the online commercial helicopter audience. The increasing competitive pressure to post press releases on line as soon as possible, along with the fact that there are over 4 PR people for every journalist employed in the USA, worries Elan who is passionate about journalistic integrity and PR curration: “we are increasing our ability to devote the necessary resources to help grow our original online coverage.” To that end, Vertical has recently hired Rotor & Wing’s editor-in-chief, Andrew Parker. Despite this effort, it has not traditionally been the vocation of Vertical magazine to fill this “hot news” gap.
A strong and central “voice of the industry” still lacking
Elan agrees that there is room for a sort of “community site” for professionals by professionals. This could be a sort of “industry private” hub, linking to content from existing sources such as Vertical’s in depth stories, acting as the voice of the industry when incorrect or misleading reports appear in traditional media, and offer a practical use of online collaboration and discussion tools to improve commercial helicopter industry efficiency and safety. When I asked her who should create this online presence, she simply answered: “That is a very good question!”
Do you think that there is a need for such community site? If so, who should manage it: an association, a magazine, others? What should be their mission and site content? Feel free to leave your comments below.
AND NOW A WORD FROM A RANDOM SPONSOR:
Civilian Helicopters: the most under served AeroSpace sector for online news and information? September 12, 2014Posted by ludozone in Aerospace, eBusiness Applications/Services, International Business Development, Internet Marketing, Social Media, Twitter.
Tags: Aerospace, eBusiness, Helicopter, HeliExpo, International Business, Marketing, Social Media, Twitter
Civil Helicopter Aviation is booming. A recent study by Visiongain has determined that the value of the global civil helicopter market in 2014 will reach B$7.4 up from B$2 just six years ago. FlightGlobal Ascend predicts that the total in-service fleet will grow to over 28,000 helicopters by 2024. Yet, when it comes to online news and information for this sector, there is a big void on the internet.
CIVIL HELICOPTER COMMUNITY ABANDONED BY TRADITIONAL MEDIA?
Out of the three major Aerospace media publishers, AINOnline is the only one that offers a specific rotorcraft channel on its website. AviationWeek and FlightGlobal report helicopter news in their civil aviation section, mixed with all the other news. FlightGlobal used to have a dedicated website section and even a Twitter feed (@FG_Helicopters), but they abandoned it in 2013 even though they had over 3000 followers.
The main helicopter magazines have attempted to transition online but with mixed results. The statistics for the top sources of online news for this segment both in terms of unique visitors to their websites, as well as number of followers on Twitter, are very low. The best positioned in terms of followers is Rotor And Wing magazine with over 10,000 followers. [It turns out that Vertical magazine has many more fans on FaceBook] It is interesting to note the success of HeliHub.com, a pure online news site from the UK, run by Jeremy Parkin out of his home with the collaboration of a network of #AvGeeks from around the world. The site has quickly signed up over 5000 followers and boasts the best daily average of unique visitor of all the online sources. But if you compare the top three helicopter news sites on Twitter, you realize that they overlap significantly, accounting for less than 15,000 unique followers.
TOO FEW HELICOPTER PROFESSIONAL ONLINE?
Critics in media organizations might say that there is not much of an audience for helicopter news online. First of all, I proved that there was a need for helicopter online news with the stunt I pulled during HeliExpo 2010. Second, the online audience can be found when you look at the website traffic and twitter followers of the major Helicopter manufacturers. The top three companies account for a total of 55,000 unique followers on Twitter. As the comparison below shows, over 21000 of Airbus Helicopters’s followers do not get either Rotor and Wing nor Vertical Magazine’s twitter feeds.
The people of the industry are online, but they are going straight to the manufacturers to get information and news.
NO LEADERSHIP FROM HELICOPTER ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL (HAI)?
I think that leadership is gravely lacking when it comes to improve the civil helicopter industry using the web. Unfortunately, the main industry association (HAI), organizer of the largest helicopter event in the world (HeliExpo is attended by 20,000 visitors), continues to lack motivation, direction, and expertise in this area. Their own online presence is amateurish compared to other aerospace association (e.g. @NBAA) resulting in dismal online statistics (they have three different twitter handles reaching just 3000 unique followers combined).
HAI owes it to the industry to get its house in order and become a modern association. Beyond leading by example, HAI should also do three things immediately:
- Create an industry hashtag, as THERE IS NONE RIGH NOW!!!! (Here is why this is important). Once it is created, promote the hashtag with news organization and companies to create a real “channel” online.
- Create an Online Industry sub-committee to create and promote best online practices, gather requirements, and propose solutions.
- Inventory and promote the various source of news and information online and offer easy access to it for members of the industry (e.g. link page, twitter list, etc…)
I would love to hear your opinion on this subject, as well as suggestions for other actions that could be taken. Feel free to leave your comments below or contact me directly.
AND NOW A WORD FROM A RANDOM SPONSOR:
Over 15,000 followers in 10 months – AirLiveNet fills up the Commercial Aviation Breaking News gap September 4, 2014Posted by ludozone in Aerospace, eBusiness Applications/Services, Social Media, Twitter.
Tags: Aerospace, International Business, online news, Social Media, Twitter
add a comment
I have been saying for several years that the way our industry shares news online is antiquated compared to the mainstream media and the specialized news of other industries. After decades of printing “cold news” on a weekly and monthly basis, the main AeroSpace and Defense media organizations have yet to fully adapt to the online world of “hot news”. Although organizations such as AviationWeek have made great strides in trying to report industry news as it happens, it is mostly left to the personal initiative of their journalists to write up and post breaking news online. Unfortunately, such task is not their top priority and often if an incident does not happen during normal business hours it does not get reported until much later or not at all.
Yet, most general media from CNN, to BBC News, to local News will cover any airline or airports incidents or breaking news immediately. Unfortunately, the stories often end up in the hands of unqualified journalist with disastrous consequences when it comes to accuracy or relevancy. Without the counter balance of the specialized media reporting accurate/corrected information immediately, it opens up a gap in breaking news coverage, particularly in the domain commercial aviation.
AirLiveNet, the online source for commercial aviation breaking news
@AirLiveNet started to pick up a following during the #MH370 events, and maintained its presence through the succession of major commercial aviation news of the last few months (#MH17, #AH5017, #Bardarbunga). The focus, timeliness and accuracy of AirLiveNet tweets is definitely its competitive advantage. They only report on commercial aviation “hot news” especially incidents; no distractions, no fillers, no cold news. They are usually the first to report a flight emergency, route diversion, airport incident, or squawking anomaly. They usually back it up with accurate flight radar data, correct airplane pictures, and often photos and videos from the scene. How successful have they been in the 10 months since their launch? They now have over 15,600 followers. That is over 3000 more followers than @AINonline!
So who is behind this success and what are their plans?
I tracked down and interviewed the site owner to find out more. “Seb” is a self declared #AvGeek who resides in Paris, France. He launched the site at the end of last year to “fill the gap” in commercial aviation news. Seb said: “I thought that with tools like flightradar24 and other sophisticated internet search engines, individuals with even limited knowledge of the commercial aviation business could probably do a decent job in providing breaking news information online. I felt that we could do it more accurately than the general media, and more quickly than the specialized aviation media.” He excitedly retells the story of the coverage of the Air Algeria #AH5017 crash in August. They were the first ones to report the actual flight number and last known flight path of the airplane. They continued the coverage minute-by-minute, and when a french television station had the first video of the crash site, relayed from a Mali Army briefing, they were the first ones to put it out on twitter.
Seb started AirLiveNet as a “hobby” with a simple twitter feed and a blog page to store the referenced information he posted. He set up the right reporting in flightradar24 and other flight tracking sites, and built several “search robots” to alert him of any incident in real time. When asked about the breadth of coverage available on AirLiveNet, he explains: “I was quickly joined by other volunteers who offered to help curate the alerts and feed the site, providing us with a round-the-clock coverage of the industry.” AirLiveNet is now a network of about 5 volunteers spread out geographically. In addition, a number of local news organizations are sending them information directly. “A real indication of the service we provide is when last weekend, for example, a local Norwegian news outfit sent us the video of an emergency landing in Oslo right after it happened”, said Seb.
AirLiveNet follows in the footsteps of @NYCAviation, another “grass root” aviation news site that started as a plane spotting publication focused on New York City in 2003. It now has over 38,000 followers. Although less focused on commercial aviation than AirLiveNet, NYCAviation (motto: “serving airborne amazingness from around the world”) frequently breaks aviation news stories ahead of any other outlets. The site is now an advertising-based commercial site that provides consulting and expert TV appearances to major news organizations. NYCAviation also sees its editorial content regularly referenced in, or syndicated out to traditional media outlets.
When asked about the future of AirLiveNet, Seb explains: “I would like to grow my network of volunteers to augment the geographic coverage we provide, particularly in North America. I do not have plans to turn AirLiveNet into a full commercial venture for the moment. The general banner ads currently on the site basically cover the small hosting and application license costs, but with 15,000 followers in such a short time, I am starting to wonder if we have unintentionally created a real business.”
AirLiveNet and NYCAviation are definitely teaching a lesson in “hot news” reporting for our industry. If the major aviation news organizations will not staff round-the-clock breaking news networks, they will need to syndicate this kind of content or face increasing competition for audience and recognition. Online breaking news coverage is an entirely new world and you cannot just “evolve” into it. As AirLiveNet is proving, you probably need to be born from it.
AND NOW A WORD FROM A RANDOM SPONSOR:
LABACE #FAIL: Three Reasons Aviation Exhibition Organizers Can No Longer Ignore Twitter August 14, 2014Posted by ludozone in Aerospace, Conference, eBusiness Applications/Services, International Business Development, Internet Marketing, Management, Social Media, Twitter.
Tags: Aerospace, eBusiness, International Business, Marketing, Social Media, Twitter
1 comment so far
This week’s Latin America Business Aviation Conference and Exhibition has provided another poignant illustration of the de-facto use of Twitter in the aviation industry. As South America is one of the fastest growing markets for business aviation, all the major industry players and news outfits took to Twitter to share their news from and about the show: @AugustaWestland, @AVFuel, @Beechcraft, @Bombardier_Aero, @Cessna, @DallasAirmotive, @DassaultFalcon, @DuncanAviation, @GulfstreamAero, @Honeywell_Aero, @NBAA, @One_Bell (Bell Helicopters), @RockwellCollins, and @Turbomeca, as well as, @AINonline, @ASDNewsCom, @AviationToday, @FlightCorporate, and @FlightGlobal. In total, several hundred accounts tweeted about LABACE.
But what the organizers failed to do was to organize, feed and manage this Twitter channel. As a result, messages were posted in three different streams (#LABACE, #LABACE14, and #LABACE2014) or without any hashtags, making it impossible to isolate a channel for the show on Twitter. In addition, there was no direct voice from the organizers (even though they had a Twitter account back in 2011). Finally they failed to create buzz about this very important business aviation event before, during or after the show. It should not have been complicated for the organizers to figure out what to do, as their middle east (@MEBA) and european conterparts (@EBACE) are doing a great job with their respective shows.
THREE REASONS ORGANIZERS CAN NO LONGER IGNORE TWITTER:
- Exhibitors, visitors and the press are tweeting about your show: As Farnborough has shown, aviation companies are now using Twitter as a main stream communication tool. It is no longer possible to think that Twitter will not be used at your show. This is why it it important to do two things: 1) establish a Twitter account for the show, and 2) create a hashtag for the event. The hashtag will allow you to establish a “channel” on Twitter which will be easy for everyone to use and follow. When choosing a hashtag, make sure it is not too long and is not already used for something else. Also, it is not necessary to incorporate the year into the hashtag as Twitter archives can easily be filtered by date. With the Twitter account, start interacting with the exhibitors early and promote the hashtag with them, the press and on the event website. Also, don’t forget to submit it to this hashtag event list page.
- Not everyone can be physically at the show: Your target audience is much larger than the relatively few that will be able to travel to the event. Remote users will leverage the power of Twitter to follow the show and in turn help their case for traveling to the next one, or at least help with its promotion in the industry. Twitter is like an infinite mailing list and you never know who might be interested in your event. But with Twitter, there is a better chance they will find out about you.
- You must manage your own buzz: Professionals following you or our hashtag on Twitter should feel that they are missing out by not being at the show. This is how you create buzz. Start by posting information early (e.g. registration volumes, major exhibitor participation, press coverage). During the show, post pictures, video recaps and other “behind the scenes” information that would not be found elsewhere. After the show, thank the visitors and exhibitors, recap how great the show was, and prepare for the next event.
This work does not need to be intensive or costly, but is no longer optional. If show organizers cannot do it themselves, they can certainly hire a contractor on a temporary basis to help them with their online/twitter presence. (Full disclosure: This is a service I provide). I look forward to seeing more use of Twitter and innovative online marketings around the virtual side of the physical aviation events.
Have you seen good examples of aviation show organizers user Twitter or failing to do so? Please start a discussion below with your comments.
AND NOW A WORD FROM A RANDOM SPONSOR:
At Farnborough, Airbus, Boeing and 5 Other Large AeroSpace Companies Broadcasted Directly Online July 23, 2014Posted by ludozone in Aerospace, Conference, eBusiness Applications/Services, International Business Development, Internet Marketing, Management, Social Media, Twitter.
Tags: Aerospace, Airbus, Boeing, eBusiness, Farnborough Air Show, FIA14, International Business, Marketing, Social Media, Twitter, Website
In a sign that information dissemination is changing rapidly in the Aerospace and Defense industry, Airbus, BAESYSTEMS, Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Thales, and Saab set up there own web pages on the occasion of the Farnborough International Airshow. It is not the first time for this kind of communication strategy: Airbus, Boeing, and Raytheon did it in 2010. What is unique about it is that using Twitter in combination with the webpages, they have been able to draw online traffic to their site in volumes never seen before.
First, let’s look at what information was available on these “micro-sites”:
|BAE SYSTEMS||13||1||32||Twitter Feed, Media Contact, Show Schedule, Stand Tour, Products on Display|
|Boeing||15||9||17||Presentations, Briefing Schedule, Biographies, Media Contacts|
|Lockheed Martin||8||0||16||Media Contacts, Briefing Schedule, Featured Programs|
|Saab||4||15||71||Media Contacts, Twitter Feed, Presentations|
|Thales||N/A||N/A||N/A||Posted Articles, photos and videos directly on Twitter and published on flashboard (ThalesLive)|
Out of the companies that created these micro-sites, Airbus went all out on videos and photos. As a result, they trended on the Twitter stats for most of the show. It was great that, along with Raytheon, they continued to cover the public part of the show to try to leverage enthusiasm for the industry from younger fans. I also liked BAESYSTEMS stand tour, Saab posting its presentations, and Raytheon’s infographics.
As I explained before, it is now possible to narrow the Twitter feeds to just the interest you might have (e.g. #FIA14) and get just the news you want. In the past businesses counted on the industry press to “relay” and aggregate their press releases to their readers. Now, Twitter can be the aggregate and companies are broadcasting directly. After all, they have the best information about themselves. And the industry is responding. In the table below you can see the growth in followers for the major A&D companies. In comparison, @AviationWeek has “only” 83,298 followers (@AINOnline 12,274 – @FlightGlobal 53,864).
|Twitter Account||Followers at 2009 Paris Air Show||Followers at 2010 Farnborough||Followers at 2014 Farnborough||Tweets on #FIA14|
|@Saab||Not On||Not On||5,549||79|
|@RollsRoyce||Not On||Not On||20,083||13|
|@Snecma||Not On||Not On||4,530||2|
This shift to Twitter, embraced long ago by other industry and finally gaining traction in Aerospace, will force industry news to change their coverage of shows like Farnborough and focus on delivering added value and not just be a “relay” for the news. It will be important for them to provide opinion pieces, mash-ups, and contrasts (e.g. Infographic on Airbus vs Boeing orders from FlightGlobal). For other Aerospace companies not yet using micro-sites, blogs and twitter to directly manage their corporate communication, it is time to seriously think about it.
What do you think of this communication strategy? Should these companies do something more or different? Are there other companies doing things worth mentioning here? Please comment below.
AND NOW A WORD FROM A RANDOM SPONSOR:
Tags: Aerospace, eBusiness, Farnborough Air Show, FIA14, International Business, Marketing, Social Media, Twitter
Although 100,000 trade visitors attend the Farnborough International Airshow every 4 years, a majority of the Aerospace and Defense industry is forced to stay tuned to the show from afar. This review is intended to analyze the information available from the respective websites of the main industry news outlets. Specifically, I will discuss:
- Aviation International News (AIN) Farnborough Coverage
- Aviation Week Farnborough Coverage
- Flight Global Farnborough Coverage
SHOW COVERAGE BY THE NUMBERS
Let’s start by looking at the amount of news shared online and how it was shared. You can read my other posts for Farnborough iPhone App Reviews, Twitter Statics, Aerospace companies use of Twitter, and Daily News Reviews. This post will focus instead on the overall coverage.
AVIATION INTERNATIONAL NEWS (AIN) COVERAGE
AIN made a strong case for the most complete airshow information online. For starters, their website was simple but functional. It had all the important functions: searching, sharing, tagging, headlining, and commenting. They published the majority of their daily articles online in addition to a complete “print online” version of the daily magazines. That was almost 100 more free articles than Flight Global and almost 200 more than Aviation Week. They had categorized photo albums as well as a number of strong videos with good content, editing and journalistic integrity (i.e. not sponsored).
Despite the best content, the execution of the coverage disappointed. The online app regressed compared to previous version, headline dumping (aka robo-tweet) continued to be the main activity on Twitter, and blogs remained nonexistent. In addition, a lack of attention to details made part of the website annoying: the overlay ad that didn’t close properly; some misfiled content such as the Farnborough videos not available in the multimedia section; the forgotten tab selection when using the back button; the lack of seamless navigation such as the inability to come back to the Farnborough coverage after navigating to some parts of the site. It left you with a “meh” feeling. It was like receiving a really badly gift wrapped present: if you manage to get past the ugly paper and the difficult knots, you will really enjoy the content. AIN should go back to its old app and hire a digital media manager for the website so it can leverage and organize the great content generated by its journalists and video editors.
AVIATION WEEK COVERAGE
Except for the disappointing “print online” version of its daily news, AviationWeek was firing on all cylinders at this show. The iphone app was good, the website was good, and the content was good and varied (including 14 videos). Several members of the AvWeek staff stepped up in front of the camera and produced good results. For example, I liked the exclusive video of the A350 demo flight from inside the cockpit. They also posted several blogs and a few photos (ATW had an additional 43 unlinked photos on its own site). Their Twitter presence was “human driven” with the Farnborough AvWeek team augmenting the official stream content counted above with 87 additional posts (almost half of them from social media director @avweekrupa, but why was ATW not posting in #FIA14?). This organized twitter strategy is why they have the most followers and the highest klout. And that is why they were the only specialized news organization making the top twitter influencers list for the show.
My only (small) issue with Aviation Week continued to be with the available content. They made a good effort to force the integration of ATW and SpeedNews articles in the website, but though a inconvenient virtual “aggregated content”. About 100 articles from the Show News did not make it to the website. The content remained focused on the big companies (aka advertisers?). I wish I could see more integrated and free content including the use of infographics as well as more photos from ShowNews.
However, I have to name Aviation Week as Best Coverage for Farnborough 2014. They also definitely deserve the “Best Social Media” nod they received at the Aerospace Media Awards.
FLIGHT GLOBAL COVERAGE
In my coverage of the 2010 Edition of the show, Flight Global was definitely the leader. Four years later, I felt really disappointed by their performance.
- iFlight – this online newsletter had very little content and was mostly a gimmick. It was in conflict with the “print online” version of the daily news and its content was not re-purposed (e.g. why were the cutaways not also in the designated section of the site?)
- Articles – Like Aviation week, Flight Global only posted a fraction of its articles in the free section. It was too bad because one of the thing FG did well was Infographics which the others didn’t do. They seemed confined to the iFlight and daily news. What made it a lot worse was that you could not comment or share the articles once you opened them.
- Blogs – This was the old strength of FG but they were now nonexistent (only 4 produced). They were not even linked from the Farnborough page.
- Photos and Videos – The photo section was never updated when pictures were added, so you only saw new pictures by swiping through the previewer. FG posted the most videos but they were mislabeled and not posted in chronological order. In addition, they were sponsored by Airbus so for example, none of the daily briefs mentioned ANY orders for Boeing aircraft.
- Twitter – Most of the FG posts from the main publishing engine and from the staff were sent outside #FIA14 thus not visible for most of the show watchers. The rest of the posts seemed to be out of personal habit rather than driven from a strategic plan.
I think FG needs more leadership and discipline when it comes to online coverage. They must rethink their content like iFlight but should use more of their great infographics. They could also use better website technology and must think about their mobile presence (they no longer have an app for example).
CONCLUSIONS AND WISHES
Although Aviation Week has come a long way in 4 years and AINOnline continues with really good content, all three organizations must progress in reinventing themselves in the age of online coverage. As I explained in this post regarding the information available on twitter, the old way of reporting the news is no longer competitive. Large corporations produce their own news site for the show and traditional media produce specialized coverage of their own (WSJ produced a dedicated Farnborough section with 60 articles and 120 tweets to up to 4.7 Million accounts!). The industry audience is getting younger and is not gathering information in the same manner as before. Therefore, the industry news organizations must focus less on news reporting and more on “added-value” (e.g. mash-ups, analysis and opinions) and how to deliver it online to their (new) readers. If they do a good job at that, the sponsors will follow. If not, they will be replaced by new leaner providers.
What did you like/not like about the Farnborough online coverage. What should be done differently?
AND NOW A WORD FROM A RANDOM SPONSOR:
My Favorite Non-Flying Photos of Farnborough 2014 July 18, 2014Posted by ludozone in Aerospace, Conference, eBusiness Applications/Services, Internet Marketing, Social Media, Twitter.
Tags: Aerospace, eBusiness, Farnborough Air Show, FIA14, Pictures, Social Media, Twitter
add a comment
If you search for photos of Farnborough 2014 online, you will find tons of fantastic aircraft pictures. While these are best left to be judged by professionals like at the AviationWeek Annual Photo Contest, I wanted to showcase pictures of things that don’t fly. Although there were a lot of them, I excluded any selfies from my selection (this is a new category in AvWeek’s contest BTW). So here is my selection, you can click on the pictures to see a larger version.
The ATR static display featured the best automobiles at the show: the DeLorean from “Back to the Future” (photo by @RAFNewsReporter) and an aircraft shaped electric golf cart (photo by @Raytheon).
Did you see other non-flying pictures from Farnborough that should make this list? Email them to me at email@example.com and don’t forget to attribute the source/credit the photographer.
AND NOW A WORD FROM A RANDOM SPONSOR:
Farnborough 2014 Daily News Magazines – Online Review July 18, 2014Posted by ludozone in Aerospace, eBusiness Applications/Services, International Business Development, Internet Marketing, Social Media.
Tags: Aerospace, eBusiness, Farnborough Air Show, FIA14, International Business, Marketing, Social Media, Website
If you have been to an international air show like Paris or Farnborough, you have probably picked up several of them: the printed daily news magazines published by the three main Aerospace news organizations (Aviation International News (AIN), Aviation Week, and Flight Global). They are each printed in thousands of copies and handed out for free at multiple locations. It was no different at Farnborough this year where each organization produced 4 issues. In fact, together in total, they published a colossal 800 magazine pages with more than 700 articles (See all the statistics here). These publications are great for attendees, but they are also available online. Here is my review and opinion of each of them.
Aviation International News (AIN) Farnborough Airshow News
At 112 pages of content over the 4 editions, AIN produced the smallest of the three magazines, but still managed to publish about 190 articles. The online version was linked promptly and directly from the AINonline Farnborough Coverage website. The content was pretty standard fare keeping up with AIN’s tradition and editorial style. The ISSUU viewing technology which AIN has been using since 2010 was very responsive and simple to use. It had all the functions you need: search, share, zoom, and clip. It was fully usable on iPad without an app. You can create an account and “save” magazines or clips for later use, emailing or sharing. In addition, AIN posted most of its Airshow News articles directly on the website and on twitter, so it was a good reuse of the content online.
Aviation Week ShowNews
The team at Aviation Week published the most content pages (150) including 266 articles. Each edition was linked from the Aviation Week Farnborough Coverage website and I liked that they embedded multimedia in some of the editions by replacing static pictures with video. The magazine contained some in-depth interviews with big players but also news from SMEs as the week went on. However, the Zinio viewing technology was disappointing compared to the others. First of all, the publications were not indexed so the search feature did not work. Secondly, there was no clipping or sharing functions so any information found here could not be reused elsewhere. Thirdly, because Zinio is using Adobe Flash technology, it was not available on iPad. Finally, the content of the magazine was not available on the Aviation Week website (although I am told that some of the articles are published in the subscription-only area).
FlightGlobal Flight Daily News
Flight global decided not to publicize the fact that they had their Flight Daily News available online (other than for a couple of direct tweets from staff), and instead promoted their three web-only iFlight Daily News briefs. I wonder what the purpose of this publication really was. With about 10 news items for each edition it was hardly comprehensive. Each edition had an interactive cut-away, some video content, and some good infographics (e.g. Order Tracking). But between the content posted directly in their Farnborough Coverage website and the electronic version of the Daily News linked at the end of each iFlight edition, this seemed redundant. In addition, iFlight requires an app to be viewed on iPad. It would have been much better for them to incorporate this content in the online Daily News (e.g. cut-away) or on the website (e.g. video). However, once you finally accessed the actual electronic version of Daily News in the PageSuite technology, it was actually very nice. The content was varied and pleasantly layed-out. The “Face the Facts” interview series with a number of CEOs should have its own section on the website. There were some content gems buried in there (e.g. Boeing vs Airbus infographics) that would have deserved greater exposure on the website and on Twitter. Like AIN’s viewer, this viewing tool had all you needed: search, zoom, share, clip and was fully usable on iPad without an app. This technology was easier to use but it did not allow me to set-up a personal account online. In terms of content, Flight Global produced the largest amount of pages (306) and articles (281) of the three organizations. They too decided to post some of this content in their subscriber only section of the website.
I understand the need for these magazines at the show and, with 400 pages of advertising (estimated revenue $4 million), they probably pay for the news organization’s complete on-site presence. But, if you are going to bother putting these together, I think you should get the most bang for the bucks:
- If you are going to publish the magazine “as-is”, be sure to promote it (website and twitter) and use a good viewer that as a minimum includes a search engine (nobody is going to read these cover to cover online – unless they print it).
- If you are handing out this magazine for free on-site, and making an electronic version available for free on-line, why would you publish the content in a subscriber-only section of your website? This seems like a far-fetched way of boosting subscriber “exclusive”. Instead make the content available for free or under free registration.
- A lot of content (articles, pictures and videos) is being created around these publications. Consider re-purposing this content on the website directly. Why keep this content only for one day? Post it and open it up to the rest of the world.
Based on that, I must declare that AIN Farnborough Airshow News did the best out of the three organizations on this part of their online coverage (See also Full Review of FIA14 Online Coverage). As for the others, AviationWeek should pick a new viewer and Flight Global should reconsider iFlight Daily News.
Please leave a comment below to share your impression of these magazines. Your ideas, replies and suggestions are always welcome.
AND NOW A WORD FROM A RANDOM SPONSOR: